|
Casino
Roulette has been around longer, perhaps, than any other game of
chance. And, because there are so many different ways to place wagers
in the game, hundreds of different playing systems have been created.
Now, add to this a myriad of betting tactics along with hundreds
of additional permutations, and we wind up with an infinite number
of possible ways to play the game.
Playing the game
and beating the game are two entirely different animals however.
While there are countless ways to play, there are only a handful
of ways to truly beat casino Roulette.
In this feature,
I will first walk you through the four known ways to really beat
the game. Then I will critique a few of the methods currently on
the market.
Progression
Betting
The great Albert
Einstein was quoted as saying, "The only way to beat Roulette
is to steal the money when the dealer's not looking." In a
sense, he was correct. His point was that there is no way to employ
some mathematical configuration of bets to overcome the house edge.
Absolutely true.
However, in his
fascinating book, Thirteen Against the Bank, the late Norman Leigh
shows us in precise detail how he successfully used an aggressive
up-as-you-win betting progression to systematically beat Monte Carlo
out of $160,000. This coup took place in 1966 over a ten-day period
before Mr. Leigh was tossed out of the casino and out of the country!
Albert Einstein
had not considered this type of purely mathematical approach in
his assessment.
The fact is that
Roulette can be beaten with an appropriate betting progression.
However, beating the game with this type approach in today's game
is impractical and perhaps even impossible.
Norman Leigh was
playing in Monte Carlo in the mid 1960's. He was allowed to play
without interference or heat (until he was eventually barred from
play). He was also playing in games with huge min-to-max betting
spreads that were necessary to make his approach work.
Here's how he
did it:
He first trained
a team of twelve players (thirteen including himself) to work a
reverse Labouchere betting progression while placing wagers on all
six outside, even-money bets at the same time; odd, even, red, black,
high and low. When a natural "win streak" would occur
on any one of these betting positions, the Labouchere would dictate
increased wagers. When the streak successfully culminated in a table
maximum bet, the player would take down the final winning bet and
start over again at table minimum - realizing a huge profit (around
6,000 units).
As you may suspect,
these successful win streaks were few and far between. Most of the
time, the team experienced lots of small loses. However, the occasional
big wins more than offset the small loses to net a consistent and
handsome profit.
I have tested
this approach against a huge database of real-world spin results
and found that it still works. But... to work consistently, a casino
needs to allow betting spreads of up to 1:2,000 (for example; $5
minimum, $10,000 maximum). Drawdowns can approach $15,000; players
are very obvious to casino personnel (inviting serious heat) and
incredible perseverance is required. Not a very attractive proposition.
Norman Leigh and
his team could play with starting units of only twenty-five cents.
Today, we must start with $5 in most casinos. Additionally, most
casinos today will not allow a betting spread large enough to take
down a huge win when a streak occurs.
I've heard about
a few teams operating today trying to duplicate Norman Leigh's performance,
but I've not heard of anyone succeeding. I believe that these teams
have not done all their homework and are destined to fail from the
start.
Famous Roulette
Betting Systems
Any discussion
on progression betting would not be complete without addressing
some of the more famous systems such as the Martingale, the Grand
Martingale, the d'Alembert, the Labouchere, Fibonacci or Oscar's
Grind. With the exception of Fibonacci, these systems are up-as-you-lose,
negative betting progression techniques. And each has been directly
responsible for the financial ruin and even suicides of many unknowing
gamblers. Generally, these systems are touted as ways to consistently
beat the casino with simple wager manipulations. What happens in
actual practice is this: Players will indeed accumulate lots of
small wins. But occasionally, a huge loss wipes out all the profit
... and more. In the long run, the player always loses.
To be an overall
winner using progression betting alone (without some kind of valid
player-favorable bias), a player must use a positive, up-as-you-win
betting progression in playing conditions similar to Norman Leigh's.
A player must also be very well bankrolled, disciplined and willing
to take the enormous risk associated with this type of approach.
I don't recommend it.
Biased Wheel
Play
It has been theorized
that no Roulette wheel is mechanically perfect and all are therefore
subject to biases in certain sectors or towards certain pockets.
Roulette history is filled with stories of players who detected
such biases and successfully exploited them for huge wins.
A few of the more
famous coups include a 19th century English mechanic named Jaggers
who took Monte Carlo for $250,000. Al Hibbs and Roy Walford, two
college students, who in the late 1940's took Reno casinos for $25,000,
became national celebrities. Most recently, between 1986 and 1989,
a noted high roller named Billy Walters took Atlantic City casinos
for over $4,000,000! These were fantastic accomplishments and certainly
worthy of the fame they generated.
Each of these
coups involved a lot of up-front work. Teams of "clockers"
would spend weeks recording spin results on dozens of wheels trying
to find strong biases. When one was identified, a player would sit
and wager on the biased number(s) round the clock until some objective
was reached or until casino management stopped the action.
Biased wheel play
has been accepted by most modern gambling experts as a viable way
to beat Roulette and several recent books teach precisely how to
do it - most notably Beating the Wheel by Russell Barnhart.
I'm sorry to say,
however, that this information and way of thinking is about eight
years too late.
By the end of
the 1980's, casino management became increasingly concerned with
biased wheels. They began making wholesale changes in the equipment
used. Prior to this time, most all wheels featured deep pocket separators
(high frets) that were fastened as individual components. These
high frets were a major contributor to wheel biases. Between 1989
and 1991, most casinos completely changed their old high fret wheels
with new, single component, low profile fret wheels -- far less
likely to cause biases. Additionally, casinos began installing electronic
display boards (tote boards) that monitor for biased sectors/numbers.
Today, it is nearly
impossible to find/exploit mechanically biased wheels.
Authors who are
a bit behind the times, are unknowingly misleading players into
believing we can still win by playing against biased wheels. They
have spent time preparing well written books with all the mathematical,
bankroll, and table play criteria one would need to exploit biased
wheels. But it simply will not work today. Yes, there are still
a few old fashioned high fret wheels around operating without electronic
tote boards. You can bet they are being watched very carefully.
In fact, most of these casinos have standing policies that disallow
anyone from recording spin results while standing in the aisle (remember
it takes days/weeks of clocking to determine a valid bias).
If/When a casino
detects a biased wheel, they can simply change the equipment. And
there goes any possibility of winning.
Bottom line? Biased
wheel play in most of today's casinos is not viable.
Sector Targeting
Here's a really
creative use of high technology to beat the wheel. Nearly thirty
years ago, computer technology had advanced to a point where small,
concealed computers could be used in a casino. Edward O. Thorp and
others devised a way to calculate the decaying orbit of a roulette
ball as it slows and descends into a pocket. With two determinant
points, they could successfully calculate the sector into which
the ball was most likely to drop. And with good enough frequency
to gain a huge edge over the house. The chronicles of this work
are brilliantly written in an interesting book, The Eudaemonic Pie
by Thomas Bass.
The process is
fairly straight forward. One simply determines the dealer's release
point, determines a second traverse point after one or two rotations
of the wheel, then inputs the data into a computer and the targeted
sector is instantly calculated. Chips are wagered on the appropriate
numbers and that's it! Sounds nice and easy. But think about the
actual execution. Two points must be accurately determined while
the wheel is in full motion. The points must be input into a computer.
An answer must be read out. And chips must be placed on the roulette
layout. All in sequential order and all in the heat of action.
As you might imagine,
this method worked fine in the lab but failed miserably in the casino.
Today, I am sure
that there are teams of players successfully using this concept
with modern computer equipment to exploit the game. But it is illegal
and therefore not suggested as a viable winning method. In Nevada,
players can be jailed if caught using electronic devices. In other
casino locations , penalties are not quite so severe. But players
may be escorted out and barred from future play.
In 1983, Scott
Lang published a book describing his patented Targeting Sectoring
method. Similar in concept, his method involved using only a digital
stop watch to determine the targeted sector. At the time of publication,
Jerry got enthused. He and good friend Gil Stead went out, bought
a Roulette wheel, practiced the technique and played it in Atlantic
City. It worked! At first anyhow. Casinos quickly caught on and
implemented simple countermeasures to stop the winning. With Scott
Lang's method, a relatively slow rotating wheel was necessary for
success. Dealers were instructed to simply increase the speed of
the wheel. The winning was over.
Unfortunately,
this method is now obsolete. Today, stop watches in table play are
a definite taboo.
Dealer Signatures
Here's a winning
method that we can use in today's casinos.
The dealer signature
phenomenon is nothing all that new. When I first started work on
Signature Series (SS) Roulette in 1989, I thought many of my discoveries
were novel. I thought that my relative number concept was unique.
But as I got more deeply involved in the research, I found that
relative numbers and the concept of a dealer signature had been
worked with before and even published in a brief 1979 Gambling Times
article. While I was a bit disappointed that my ideas were not unique,
I was excited to learn that the concept was right on.
I found that this
early work on dealer signatures was no longer viable in today's
game. I intensified my efforts and succeeded in developing some
truly unique techniques to successfully exploit a dealer's signature.
My Signature Series
I resembles some of the early work (with several notable exceptions).
But SS II and SS III are completely unique. The discovery of H Factor
release dealers and the playing techniques developed to exploit
them are also unique. All aspects of SS Roulette are perfectly suited
to today's game.
SS Roulette is
proprietary and cannot be found in any of the popular literature.
Some authors are now coming around to the fact that roulette can
be consistently beaten with a signature type approach. But, so far,
they haven't come close to suggesting a workable method.
I truly believe
that we have done a pretty good job keeping things under wrap for
the last few years.
Mail Order
Roulette Systems
An example of
mail order systems are those that are sold through the mail by a
outfit out of Brooklyn, New York. If you've managed to somehow get
on their mailing list, you are undoubtedly familiar with their stuff.
Periodically, you get a plain envelope containing a four-page two-color
brochure promising to make you financially independent with their
unique casino roulette system, thoroughbred handicapping method
or something else. The cost of each magic system is usually around
$30, with a full money back guarantee, of course.
Here's the spin:
These people are running something very close to a scam operation.
You order the information by sending a check to the appropriate
address. The product is shipped promptly. It comes usually in the
form of a 12 - 25 page booklet. The envelope it is shipped in along
with the booklet itself has no return address or phone number. So
if you opt for a refund, you don't know where to go (pretty slick,
eh?). The information contained in the booklet is always worthless.
It describes some variation of a negative up-as-you-lose betting
progression. Unknowing players will use the method with typical
short term success, followed by long term failure.
I recommend never
ordering anything from a mail order outfit with the expectation
of winning. But their advertising literature and bold claims are
fun to read.
Internet-marketed
Systems
Here are a handful
of the Roulette systems currently being hawked on the World Wide
Web or through gambling related newsgroups. Some of them are being
sold as cheaply as $10. Others, a bit more. One bold system is being
offered for $15,000 to the first ten lucky buyers. Only ten will
be sold! (Incidentally, no one has bitten at this particular offer
yet).
Most of these
systems offer basic instruction on working the Labouchere betting
progression or some variation of it. Some address biases. Some are
so confusing I am not quite sure what they are trying to say. Be
very cautious in ordering a system off the Internet (except through
our recommended link below).
The bottom line
on all other Roulette systems is to be cautiously optimistic. Undoubtedly,
Roulette systems are going to be offered for sale as long as the
game exists. A select few will have merit, the vast majority will
not. Before investing time or money, talk with the developer, talk
with a few long-term users, and insist on a clearly defined money
back satisfaction guarantee. With these assurances, you'll never
get burned.
Good Luck!
|